Ultimately, it’s all just more tinkering, and what the Fed should be doing is…
by Ryan McMaken of Mises Institute
The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee announced Wednesday it is raising its key policy rate—the federal funds rate—by 75 basis points to 2.5 percent. According to the FOMC’s press release, the committee recognizes that economic activity is declining but that Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation also “remains elevated”:
Recent indicators of spending and production have softened. Nonetheless, job gains have been robust in recent months, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Inflation remains elevated, reflecting supply and demand imbalances related to the pandemic, higher food and energy prices, and broader price pressures.
The committee goes on to state that with these conditions in mind, it will raise the target rate in order to “achieve … [CPI] inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run.” Moreover, the committee states it “will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities.”
There were not many surprises here. Most Fed watchers were predicting a 75 basis point increase, and that’s what the Fed delivered.
This then leaves us with the question of what now. The Fed doesn’t know, and the weakness of the present economy will keep the Fed very cautious moving forward.
As is clear from Powell’s press conference Wednesday, following the release of the FOMC statement, the Fed is still holding out hope for a “soft landing” in which it can significantly reduce inflation without sizably reducing employment or causing a greatly weakened economy.
How the economy will react to the Fed’s changes remains a complete mystery to the Fed, however, as has long been clear. It only took six weeks, after all, for the Fed to go from a stance of “economic activity appears to have picked up” (at the June meeting) to noting how “recent indicators of spending and production have softened” (in its July report).
The fact the Fed has no idea how things will go is emphasized by Powell’s admission that the Fed isn’t planning to offer any more forward guidance this year, which frees it up to make more last-minute decisions and to more aggressively make things up as it goes. Specifically, Powell said that moving forward “we think it’s time to just go to a meeting by meeting basis, and not provide the kind of clear guidance that we did on the way to neutral.”
Translation: “Things might go even more off the rails at any time, so let’s just play it by ear.”
Powell further emphasized that he believes the US is not currently in recession and that “we’re [i.e., the Fed policy makers] not trying to have a recession and we don’t think we have to.” Powell, however, admitted that successfully pulling this off requires walking a very narrow path. Moreover, as Powell recognized, “growth is going to be slowing down this year,” and the path to reducing CPI inflation without a recession “has narrowed” and may “narrow further.”
The Fed Bravado Is Gone
These are not the words of a man with much confidence he can do what the Fed has long promised. The Fed line for years has been that it will “not allow” inflation to rise much above its 2 percent standard, and that the Fed has “many tools” to ensure this doesn’t happen. All that big talk is now long gone.
Nor would Powell say what he would do if the economic situation worsened. When CNBC’s Steve Liesman asked Powell what standard he was using to determine how the Fed should react to worse economic news, Powell didn’t attempt any real answer and simply reiterated that the focus is inflation.
That the Fed is clearly worried about the slowing economy is apparent in just how little the Fed has actually done to tighten monetary policy in recent weeks.
Fed Policy in Context
A 2.5 percent target rate doesn’t even exceed the Fed’s timid rate hikes of 2019. Moreover, when the Fed hiked rates in 2019, the Fed’s portfolio was at only $4 trillion. Total assets have doubled since then, and the Fed has done virtually nothing to reverse this. In other words, a 2.5 target rate in 2022 means a lot less than the same rate in 2019, given the easy-money cushion provided by a Fed portfolio that’s twice as large now.
Politically, today’s rate hike may be enough to allow the Fed to claim it is doing something about inflation. After all, it can claim the fed funds rate is now the highest it’s been at any time since 2008. The Fed can also claim it is allowing its assets to roll off the balance sheet, although after months of hawkish talk, its assets have shrunk by less than 1 percent.
The question now is how long it will take the Fed to throw in the towel and “pivot” to a loosening stance due to fears over a new recession. Given the Fed’s chickening out in 2019—when it backed off rate increases after hitting only 2.5 percent—one might reasonably believe that it won’t take much for the Fed to return to “stimulus” as soon as the economic news gets even slightly worse.
A quick turn back to loosening, however, could further imperil the Fed’s credibility, which has been greatly damaged in recent months, as the Fed has consistently fallen behind the curve on inflation. As Mohamed El-Erian puts it, there are fears that the Fed is returning to the “stop-go Fed of the 1970s.” That is, people are worried this Fed is like the Arthur Burns Fed, which never really addressed the easy-money-fueled price inflation of the 1970s and let the problem snowball until the early ’80s.
Powell himself may have made a nod to this in Wednesday’s press conference when he acknowledged that a refusal to address price inflation now just “raises the cost of dealing with it later.”
Like last month, however, Powell was unable or unwilling to offer any reason for why 75 basis points was the “correct” target rate increase—as opposed to 100 basis points, 200, or zero. That’s just a number the committee made up.
Ultimately, it’s all just more tinkering, and what the Fed should be doing is stepping way back from monetary policy. It should stop “setting” the interest rate altogether. The Fed should cease open market operations, allowing the marketplace to discover what the real market interest rates actually are. That, unfortunately, is not on the Fed’s list of options.
Ryan McMaken (@ryanmcmaken) is a senior editor at the Mises Institute. Ryan has a bachelor’s degree in economics and a master’s degree in public policy and international relations from the University of Colorado. He was a housing economist for the State of Colorado. He is the author of Commie Cowboys: The Bourgeoisie and the Nation-State in the Western Genre.